↓ Skip to main content

Restricted streptomycin use in apple orchards did not adversely alter the soil bacteria communities

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Restricted streptomycin use in apple orchards did not adversely alter the soil bacteria communities
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00383
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Walsh, Daniel P. Smith, Sarah M. Owens, Brion Duffy, Jürg E. Frey

Abstract

Streptomycin has been authorized for restricted use in the prevention of the fire blight disease of pome fruit orchards in the EU and Switzerland. This study addresses the important topic of the influence of the use of streptomycin in agriculture on the total bacteria community within the soil ecosystem. Soil samples were taken from soils under apple trees, prior to streptomycin application and 2 weeks post streptomycin application or water application (untreated control). High throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was used to generate datasets from the soils under apple trees in apple orchards from three different locations in Switzerland. We hypothesized that the use of streptomycin would reduce the bacterial diversity within the soil samples and enhance a reduction in the variety of taxa present. Bacterial species such as Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, and Stenotrophomonas are intrinsically resistant to many antibiotics and as such it is of interest to investigate if the use of streptomycin provided a selective advantage for these bacteria in the soil ecosystem. The application of streptomycin did not influence the abundance and diversities of major bacteria taxa of the soils or the Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, and Stenotrophomonas species. We also discovered that apple orchards under the same management practices, did not harbor the same bacterial communities. The restricted application of streptomycin in the protection of apple orchards from the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora under the guidelines in Switzerland did not alter either the bacterial diversity or abundance within these soil ecosystems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 28%
Student > Master 9 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 14%
Environmental Science 5 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,112,344
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5,844
of 25,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,631
of 306,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#21
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.