↓ Skip to main content

New Vibrio species associated to molluscan microbiota: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New Vibrio species associated to molluscan microbiota: a review
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00413
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesús L. Romalde, Ana L. Dieguez, Aide Lasa, Sabela Balboa

Abstract

The genus Vibrio consists of more than 100 species grouped in 14 clades that are widely distributed in aquatic environments such as estuarine, coastal waters, and sediments. A large number of species of this genus are associated with marine organisms like fish, molluscs and crustaceans, in commensal or pathogenic relations. In the last decade, more than 50 new species have been described in the genus Vibrio, due to the introduction of new molecular techniques in bacterial taxonomy, such as multilocus sequence analysis or fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism. On the other hand, the increasing number of environmental studies has contributed to improve the knowledge about the family Vibrionaceae and its phylogeny. Vibrio crassostreae, V. breoganii, V. celticus are some of the new Vibrio species described as forming part of the molluscan microbiota. Some of them have been associated with mortalities of different molluscan species, seriously affecting their culture and causing high losses in hatcheries as well as in natural beds. For other species, ecological importance has been demonstrated being highly abundant in different marine habitats and geographical regions. The present work provides an updated overview of the recently characterized Vibrio species isolated from molluscs. In addition, their pathogenic potential and/or environmental importance is discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 216 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 20%
Researcher 43 19%
Student > Master 37 17%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 33 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 18%
Environmental Science 22 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 43 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2014.
All research outputs
#19,014,477
of 23,573,357 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#20,331
of 26,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,451
of 309,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#58
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,573,357 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.