↓ Skip to main content

Expression of codon optimized genes in microbial systems: current industrial applications and perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expression of codon optimized genes in microbial systems: current industrial applications and perspectives
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Elena, Pablo Ravasi, María E. Castelli, Salvador Peirú, Hugo G. Menzella

Abstract

The efficient production of functional proteins in heterologous hosts is one of the major bases of modern biotechnology. Unfortunately, many genes are difficult to express outside their original context. Due to their apparent "silent" nature, synonymous codon substitutions have long been thought to be trivial. In recent years, this dogma has been refuted by evidence that codon replacement can have a significant impact on gene expression levels and protein folding. In the past decade, considerable advances in the speed and cost of gene synthesis have facilitated the complete redesign of entire gene sequences, dramatically improving the likelihood of high protein expression. This technology significantly impacts the economic feasibility of microbial-based biotechnological processes by, for example, increasing the volumetric productivities of recombinant proteins or facilitating the redesign of novel biosynthetic routes for the production of metabolites. This review discusses the current applications of this technology, particularly those regarding the production of small molecules and industrially relevant recombinant enzymes. Suggestions for future research and potential uses are provided as well.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 253 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 23%
Researcher 44 17%
Student > Master 30 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 59 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 68 26%
Chemical Engineering 7 3%
Chemistry 6 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 2%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 67 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,713,779
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#3,525
of 24,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,531
of 305,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#14
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.