↓ Skip to main content

Effects of bacterial inoculants on the indigenous microbiome and secondary metabolites of chamomile plants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of bacterial inoculants on the indigenous microbiome and secondary metabolites of chamomile plants
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Schmidt, Martina Köberl, Amr Mostafa, Elshahat M. Ramadan, Marlene Monschein, Kenneth B. Jensen, Rudolf Bauer, Gabriele Berg

Abstract

Plant-associated bacteria fulfill important functions for plant growth and health. However, our knowledge about the impact of bacterial treatments on the host's microbiome and physiology is limited. The present study was conducted to assess the impact of bacterial inoculants on the microbiome of chamomile plants Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rauschert grown in a field under organic management in Egypt. Chamomile seedlings were inoculated with three indigenous Gram-positive strains (Streptomyces subrutilus Wbn2-11, Bacillus subtilis Co1-6, Paenibacillus polymyxa Mc5Re-14) from Egypt and three European Gram-negative strains (Pseudomonas fluorescens L13-6-12, Stenotrophomonas rhizophila P69, Serratia plymuthica 3Re4-18) already known for their beneficial plant-microbe interaction. Molecular fingerprints of 16S rRNA gene as well as real-time PCR analyses did not show statistically significant differences for all applied bacterial antagonists compared to the control. In contrast, a pyrosequencing analysis of the 16S rRNA gene libraries revealed significant differences in the community structure of bacteria between the treatments. These differences could be clearly shown by a shift within the community structure and corresponding beta-diversity indices. Moreover, B. subtilis Co1-6 and P. polymyxa Mc5Re-14 showed an enhancement of the bioactive secondary metabolite apigenin-7-O-glucoside. This indicates a possible new function of bacterial inoculants: to interact with the plant microbiome as well as to influence the plant metabolome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 185 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 40 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 10%
Chemistry 6 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 41 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,241,598
of 23,396,451 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,301
of 25,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,870
of 308,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#16
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,396,451 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.