↓ Skip to main content

Effect of the soil type on the microbiome in the rhizosphere of field-grown lettuce

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
268 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
401 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of the soil type on the microbiome in the rhizosphere of field-grown lettuce
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne Schreiter, Guo-Chun Ding, Holger Heuer, Günter Neumann, Martin Sandmann, Rita Grosch, Siegfried Kropf, Kornelia Smalla

Abstract

The complex and enormous diversity of microorganisms associated with plant roots is important for plant health and growth and is shaped by numerous factors. This study aimed to unravel the effects of the soil type on bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of field-grown lettuce. We used an experimental plot system with three different soil types that were stored at the same site for 10 years under the same agricultural management to reveal differences directly linked to the soil type and not influenced by other factors such as climate or cropping history. Bulk soil and rhizosphere samples were collected 3 and 7 weeks after planting. The analysis of 16S rRNA gene fragments amplified from total community DNA by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and pyrosequencing revealed soil type dependent differences in the bacterial community structure of the bulk soils and the corresponding rhizospheres. The rhizosphere effect differed depending on the soil type and the plant growth developmental stage. Despite the soil type dependent differences in the bacterial community composition several genera such as Sphingomonas, Rhizobium, Pseudomonas, and Variovorax were significantly increased in the rhizosphere of lettuce grown in all three soils. The number of rhizosphere responders was highest 3 weeks after planting. Interestingly, in the soil with the highest numbers of responders the highest shoot dry weights were observed. Heatmap analysis revealed that many dominant operational taxonomic units were shared among rhizosphere samples of lettuce grown in diluvial sand, alluvial loam, and loess loam and that only a subset was increased in relative abundance in the rhizosphere compared to the corresponding bulk soil. The findings of the study provide insights into the effect of soil types on the rhizosphere microbiome of lettuce.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 401 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 389 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 106 26%
Student > Master 67 17%
Researcher 66 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Student > Bachelor 26 6%
Other 49 12%
Unknown 60 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 199 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 9%
Environmental Science 35 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 4%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 24 6%
Unknown 84 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,405,707
of 24,378,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,512
of 27,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,198
of 232,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#41
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,378,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.