↓ Skip to main content

Glass-forming property of hydroxyectoine is the cause of its superior function as a desiccation protectant

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Glass-forming property of hydroxyectoine is the cause of its superior function as a desiccation protectant
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00150
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Tanne, Elena A. Golovina, Folkert A. Hoekstra, Andrea Meffert, Erwin A. Galinski

Abstract

We were able to demonstrate that hydroxyectoine, in contrast to ectoine, is a good glass-forming compound. Fourier transform infrared and spin label electron spin resonance studies of dry ectoine and hydroxyectoine have shown that the superior glass-forming properties of hydroxyectoine result from stronger intermolecular H-bonds with the OH group of hydroxyectoine. Spin probe experiments have also shown that better molecular immobilization in dry hydroxyectoine provides better redox stability of the molecules embedded in this dry matrix. With a glass transition temperature of 87°C (vs. 47°C for ectoine) hydroxyectoine displays remarkable desiccation protection properties, on a par with sucrose and trehalose. This explains its accumulation in response to increased salinity and elevated temperature by halophiles such as Halomonas elongata and its successful application in ``anhydrobiotic engineering'' of both enzymes and whole cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Bangladesh 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 76 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 14%
Chemistry 5 6%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Physics and Astronomy 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 24 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,465,487
of 23,466,057 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,933
of 25,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,061
of 227,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#49
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,466,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.