↓ Skip to main content

Mycoloop: chytrids in aquatic food webs

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mycoloop: chytrids in aquatic food webs
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maiko Kagami, Takeshi Miki, Gaku Takimoto

Abstract

Parasites are ecologically significant in various ecosystems through their role in shaping food web structure, facilitating energy transfer, and controlling disease. Here in this review, we mainly focus on parasitic chytrids, the dominant parasites in aquatic ecosystems, and explain their roles in aquatic food webs, particularly as prey for zooplankton. Chytrids have a free-living zoosporic stage, during which they actively search for new hosts. Zoospores are excellent food for zooplankton in terms of size, shape, and nutritional quality. In the field, densities of chytrids can be high, ranging from 10(1) to 10(9) spores L(-1). When large inedible phytoplankton species are infected by chytrids, nutrients within host cells are transferred to zooplankton via the zoospores of parasitic chytrids. This new pathway, the "mycoloop," may play an important role in shaping aquatic ecosystems, by altering sinking fluxes or determining system stability. The grazing of zoospores by zooplankton may also suppress outbreaks of parasitic chytrids. A food web model demonstrated that the contribution of the mycoloop to zooplankton production increased with nutrient availability and was also dependent on the stability of the system. Further studies with advanced molecular tools are likely to discover greater chytrid diversity and evidence of additional mycoloops in lakes and oceans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 234 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 16%
Student > Master 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 47 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 34%
Environmental Science 50 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 2%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 53 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,380,767
of 24,311,255 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,495
of 27,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,370
of 231,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#53
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,311,255 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.