↓ Skip to main content

Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1324 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00219
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Berry, Stefanie Widder

Abstract

Co-occurrence networks produced from microbial survey sequencing data are frequently used to identify interactions between community members. While this approach has potential to reveal ecological processes, it has been insufficiently validated due to the technical limitations inherent in studying complex microbial ecosystems. Here, we simulate multi-species microbial communities with known interaction patterns using generalized Lotka-Volterra dynamics. We then construct co-occurrence networks and evaluate how well networks reveal the underlying interactions and how experimental and ecological parameters can affect network inference and interpretation. We find that co-occurrence networks can recapitulate interaction networks under certain conditions, but that they lose interpretability when the effects of habitat filtering become significant. We demonstrate that networks suffer from local hot spots of spurious correlation in the neighborhood of hub species that engage in many interactions. We also identify topological features associated with keystone species in co-occurrence networks. This study provides a substantiated framework to guide environmental microbiologists in the construction and interpretation of co-occurrence networks from microbial survey datasets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 1%
France 5 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Estonia 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 1282 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 357 27%
Researcher 242 18%
Student > Master 156 12%
Student > Bachelor 87 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 79 6%
Other 171 13%
Unknown 232 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 481 36%
Environmental Science 173 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 152 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 62 5%
Engineering 25 2%
Other 120 9%
Unknown 311 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,181,214
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,917
of 25,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,526
of 227,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#26
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.