↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology of virus-induced asthma exacerbations: with special reference to the role of human rhinovirus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiology of virus-induced asthma exacerbations: with special reference to the role of human rhinovirus
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00226
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takeshi Saraya, Daisuke Kurai, Haruyuki Ishii, Anri Ito, Yoshiko Sasaki, Shoichi Niwa, Naoko Kiyota, Hiroyuki Tsukagoshi, Kunihisa Kozawa, Hajime Goto, Hajime Takizawa

Abstract

Viral respiratory infections may be associated with the virus-induced asthma in adults as well as children. Particularly, human rhinovirus is strongly suggested a major candidate for the associations of the virus-induced asthma. Thus, in this review, we reviewed and focused on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of virus-induced asthma with special reference on human rhinovirus. Furthermore, we added our preliminary data regarding the clinical and virological findings in the present review.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2014.
All research outputs
#12,899,679
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9,189
of 24,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,861
of 226,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#76
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.