↓ Skip to main content

Building the crops of tomorrow: advantages of symbiont-based approaches to improving abiotic stress tolerance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
310 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Building the crops of tomorrow: advantages of symbiont-based approaches to improving abiotic stress tolerance
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00283
Pubmed ID
Authors

Devin Coleman-Derr, Susannah G. Tringe

Abstract

The exponential growth in world population is feeding a steadily increasing global need for arable farmland, a resource that is already in high demand. This trend has led to increased farming on subprime arid and semi-arid lands, where limited availability of water and a host of environmental stresses often severely reduce crop productivity. The conventional approach to mitigating the abiotic stresses associated with arid climes is to breed for stress-tolerant cultivars, a time and labor intensive venture that often neglects the complex ecological context of the soil environment in which the crop is grown. In recent years, studies have attempted to identify microbial symbionts capable of conferring the same stress-tolerance to their plant hosts, and new developments in genomic technologies have greatly facilitated such research. Here, we highlight many of the advantages of these symbiont-based approaches and argue in favor of the broader recognition of crop species as ecological niches for a diverse community of microorganisms that function in concert with their plant hosts and each other to thrive under fluctuating environmental conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 301 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 22%
Researcher 58 19%
Student > Master 34 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Other 58 19%
Unknown 54 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 175 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 8%
Environmental Science 18 6%
Unspecified 5 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 13 4%
Unknown 69 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,425,089
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,993
of 24,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,881
of 228,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#18
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.