↓ Skip to main content

Coronavirus infection, ER stress, apoptosis and innate immunity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coronavirus infection, ER stress, apoptosis and innate immunity
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00296
Pubmed ID
Authors

To S. Fung, Ding X. Liu

Abstract

The replication of coronavirus, a family of important animal and human pathogens, is closely associated with the cellular membrane compartments, especially the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Coronavirus infection of cultured cells was previously shown to cause ER stress and induce the unfolded protein response (UPR), a process that aims to restore the ER homeostasis by global translation shutdown and increasing the ER folding capacity. However, under prolonged ER stress, UPR can also induce apoptotic cell death. Accumulating evidence from recent studies has shown that induction of ER stress and UPR may constitute a major aspect of coronavirus-host interaction. Activation of the three branches of UPR modulates a wide variety of signaling pathways, such as mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activation, autophagy, apoptosis, and innate immune response. ER stress and UPR activation may therefore contribute significantly to the viral replication and pathogenesis during coronavirus infection. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on coronavirus-induced ER stress and UPR activation, with emphasis on their cross-talking to apoptotic signaling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 367 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 16%
Researcher 52 14%
Student > Master 47 13%
Student > Bachelor 47 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 59 16%
Unknown 89 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 95 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 4%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 102 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,408,719
of 25,328,635 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#842
of 29,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,594
of 235,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,328,635 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.