↓ Skip to main content

Microbial monoterpene transformations—a review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbial monoterpene transformations—a review
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00346
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Marmulla, Jens Harder

Abstract

Isoprene and monoterpenes constitute a significant fraction of new plant biomass. Emission rates into the atmosphere alone are estimated to be over 500 Tg per year. These natural hydrocarbons are mineralized annually in similar quantities. In the atmosphere, abiotic photochemical processes cause lifetimes of minutes to hours. Microorganisms encounter isoprene, monoterpenes, and other volatiles of plant origin while living in and on plants, in the soil and in aquatic habitats. Below toxic concentrations, the compounds can serve as carbon and energy source for aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. Besides these catabolic reactions, transformations may occur as part of detoxification processes. Initial transformations of monoterpenes involve the introduction of functional groups, oxidation reactions, and molecular rearrangements catalyzed by various enzymes. Pseudomonas and Rhodococcus strains and members of the genera Castellaniella and Thauera have become model organisms for the elucidation of biochemical pathways. We review here the enzymes and their genes together with microorganisms known for a monoterpene metabolism, with a strong focus on microorganisms that are taxonomically validly described and currently available from culture collections. Metagenomes of microbiomes with a monoterpene-rich diet confirmed the ecological relevance of monoterpene metabolism and raised concerns on the quality of our insights based on the limited biochemical knowledge.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 248 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 24%
Researcher 44 17%
Student > Master 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 43 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 12%
Chemistry 31 12%
Environmental Science 18 7%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 54 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2016.
All research outputs
#13,110,969
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9,385
of 25,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,701
of 227,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#90
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.