↓ Skip to main content

Biosphere frontiers of subsurface life in the sedimented hydrothermal system of Guaymas Basin

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biosphere frontiers of subsurface life in the sedimented hydrothermal system of Guaymas Basin
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00362
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Teske, Amy V. Callaghan, Douglas E. LaRowe

Abstract

Temperature is one of the key constraints on the spatial extent, physiological and phylogenetic diversity, and biogeochemical function of subsurface life. A model system to explore these interrelationships should offer a suitable range of geochemical regimes, carbon substrates and temperature gradients under which microbial life can generate energy and sustain itself. In this theory and hypothesis article, we make the case for the hydrothermally heated sediments of Guaymas Basin in the Gulf of California as a suitable model system where extensive temperature and geochemical gradients create distinct niches for active microbial populations in the hydrothermally influenced sedimentary subsurface that in turn intercept and process hydrothermally generated carbon sources. We synthesize the evidence for high-temperature microbial methane cycling and sulfate reduction at Guaymas Basin - with an eye on sulfate-dependent oxidation of abundant alkanes - and demonstrate the energetic feasibility of these latter types of deep subsurface life in previously drilled Guaymas Basin locations of Deep-Sea Drilling Project 64.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 25%
Student > Master 14 17%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 17%
Environmental Science 11 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 27 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2014.
All research outputs
#12,608,638
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8,528
of 24,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,913
of 228,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#74
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.