Title |
Overcoming stalled translation in human mitochondria
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00374 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria T. Wesolowska, Ricarda Richter-Dennerlein, Robert N. Lightowlers, Zofia M. A. Chrzanowska-Lightowlers |
Abstract |
Protein synthesis is central to life and maintaining a highly accurate and efficient mechanism is essential. What happens when a translating ribosome stalls on a messenger RNA? Many highly intricate processes have been documented in the cytosol of numerous species, but how does organellar protein synthesis resolve this stalling issue? Mammalian mitochondria synthesize just thirteen highly hydrophobic polypeptides. These proteins are all integral components of the machinery that couples oxidative phosphorylation. Consequently, it is essential that stalled mitochondrial ribosomes can be efficiently recycled. To date, there is no evidence to support any particular molecular mechanism to resolve this problem. However, here we discuss the observation that there are four predicted members of the mitochondrial translation release factor family and that only one member, mtRF1a, is necessary to terminate the translation of all thirteen open reading frames in the mitochondrion. Could the other members be involved in the process of recycling stalled mitochondrial ribosomes? |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 45 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
Researcher | 8 | 17% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 32% |
Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 15% |