↓ Skip to main content

Aspergillus flavus infection induces transcriptional and physical changes in developing maize kernels

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aspergillus flavus infection induces transcriptional and physical changes in developing maize kernels
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00384
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea L. Dolezal, Xiaomei Shu, Gregory R. OBrian, Dahlia M. Nielsen, Charles P. Woloshuk, Rebecca S. Boston, Gary A. Payne

Abstract

Maize kernels are susceptible to infection by the opportunistic pathogen Aspergillus flavus. Infection results in reduction of grain quality and contamination of kernels with the highly carcinogenic mycotoxin, aflatoxin. To understanding host response to infection by the fungus, transcription of approximately 9000 maize genes were monitored during the host-pathogen interaction with a custom designed Affymetrix GeneChip® DNA array. More than 4000 maize genes were found differentially expressed at a FDR of 0.05. This included the up regulation of defense related genes and signaling pathways. Transcriptional changes also were observed in primary metabolism genes. Starch biosynthetic genes were down regulated during infection, while genes encoding maize hydrolytic enzymes, presumably involved in the degradation of host reserves, were up regulated. These data indicate that infection of the maize kernel by A. flavus induced metabolic changes in the kernel, including the production of a defense response, as well as a disruption in kernel development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Student > Bachelor 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 23 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#15,035,034
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#14,042
of 25,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,661
of 229,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#95
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.