↓ Skip to main content

Insights into novel antimicrobial compounds and antibiotic resistance genes from soil metagenomes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insights into novel antimicrobial compounds and antibiotic resistance genes from soil metagenomes
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00489
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alinne P. de Castro, Gabriel da R. Fernandes, Octávio L. Franco

Abstract

In recent years a major worldwide problem has arisen with regard to infectious diseases caused by resistant bacteria. Resistant pathogens are related to high mortality and also to enormous healthcare costs. In this field, cultured microorganisms have been commonly focused in attempts to isolate antibiotic resistance genes or to identify antimicrobial compounds. Although this strategy has been successful in many cases, most of the microbial diversity and related antimicrobial molecules have been completely lost. As an alternative, metagenomics has been used as a reliable approach to reveal the prospective reservoir of antimicrobial compounds and antibiotic resistance genes in the uncultured microbial community that inhabits a number of environments. In this context, this review will focus on resistance genes as well as on novel antibiotics revealed by a metagenomics approach from the soil environment. Biotechnology prospects are also discussed, opening new frontiers for antibiotic development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Brazil 3 2%
Portugal 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Denmark 2 1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 174 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Student > Master 24 13%
Other 9 5%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 30 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 5%
Environmental Science 8 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 30 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,586,408
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,500
of 25,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,031
of 251,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#32
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.