↓ Skip to main content

The symbiont side of symbiosis: do microbes really benefit?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The symbiont side of symbiosis: do microbes really benefit?
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00510
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justine R Garcia, Nicole M Gerardo

Abstract

Microbial associations are integral to all eukaryotes. Mutualism, the interaction of two species for the benefit of both, is an important aspect of microbial associations, with evidence that multicellular organisms in particular benefit from microbes. However, the microbe's perspective has largely been ignored, and it is unknown whether most microbial symbionts benefit from their associations with hosts. It has been presumed that microbial symbionts receive host-derived nutrients or a competition-free environment with reduced predation, but there have been few empirical tests, or even critical assessments, of these assumptions. We evaluate these hypotheses based on available evidence, which indicate reduced competition and predation are not universal benefits for symbionts. Some symbionts do receive nutrients from their host, but this has not always been linked to a corresponding increase in symbiont fitness. We recommend experiments to test symbiont fitness using current experimental systems of symbiosis and detail considerations for other systems. Incorporating symbiont fitness into symbiosis research will provide insight into the evolution of mutualistic interactions and cooperation in general.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 257 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 23%
Researcher 46 17%
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 44 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 134 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 12%
Environmental Science 19 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 51 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,834,274
of 25,388,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,203
of 29,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,782
of 263,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.