↓ Skip to main content

Survival of pathogenic and lactobacilli species of fermented olives during simulated human digestion

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Survival of pathogenic and lactobacilli species of fermented olives during simulated human digestion
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00540
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco N. Arroyo-López, Stéphanie Blanquet-Diot, Sylvain Denis, Jonathan Thévenot, Sandrine Chalancon, Monique Alric, Francisco Rodríguez-Gómez, Verónica Romero-Gil, Rufino Jiménez-Díaz, Antonio Garrido-Fernández

Abstract

The present survey uses a dynamic gastric and small intestinal model to assess the survival of one pathogenic (Escherichia coli O157:H7 EDL 933) and three lactobacilli bacteria with probiotic potential (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, L. pentosus TOMC-LAB2, and L. pentosus TOMC-LAB4) during their passage through the human gastrointestinal tract using fermented olives as the food matrix. The data showed that the survival of the E. coli strain in the stomach and duodenum was very low, while its transit through the distal parts (jejunum and ileum) resulted in an increase in the pathogen population. The production of Shiga toxins by this enterohemorrhagic microorganism in the ileal effluents of the in vitro system was too low to be detected by ELISA assays. On the contrary, the three lactobacilli species assayed showed a considerable resistance to the gastric digestion, but not to the intestinal one, which affected their survival, and was especially evident in the case of both L. pentosus strains. In spite of this, high population levels for all assayed microorganisms were recovered at the end of the gastrointestinal passage. The results obtained in the present study show the potential use of table olives as a vehicle of beneficial microorganisms to the human body, as well as the need for good hygienic practices on the part of olive manufacturers in order to avoid the possibility of contamination by food-borne pathogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 13 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Chemistry 3 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,239,689
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#22,258
of 24,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,545
of 255,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#144
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.