↓ Skip to main content

A new strategy to fight antimicrobial resistance: the revival of old antibiotics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
25 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
210 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
474 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new strategy to fight antimicrobial resistance: the revival of old antibiotics
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00551
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadim Cassir, Jean-Marc Rolain, Philippe Brouqui

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of hospital and community-acquired infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial pathogens is limiting the options for effective antibiotic therapy. Moreover, this alarming spread of antimicrobial resistance has not been paralleled by the development of novel antimicrobials. Resistance to the scarce new antibiotics is also emerging. In this context, the rational use of older antibiotics could represent an alternative to the treatment of MDR bacterial pathogens. It would help to optimize the armamentarium of antibiotics in the way to preserve new antibiotics and avoid the prescription of molecules known to favor the spread of resistance (i.e., quinolones). Furthermore, in a global economical perspective, this could represent a useful public health orientation knowing that several of these cheapest "forgotten" antibiotics are not available in many countries. We will review here the successful treatment of MDR bacterial infections with the use of old antibiotics and discuss their place in current practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 474 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 <1%
India 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 457 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 19%
Student > Master 69 15%
Student > Bachelor 60 13%
Researcher 45 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 7%
Other 85 18%
Unknown 92 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 72 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 71 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 39 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 35 7%
Other 74 16%
Unknown 112 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#343,670
of 25,388,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#192
of 29,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,372
of 272,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.