↓ Skip to main content

In vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the Drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vivo function and comparative genomic analyses of the Drosophila gut microbiota identify candidate symbiosis factors
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00576
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter D. Newell, John M. Chaston, Yiping Wang, Nathan J. Winans, David R. Sannino, Adam C. N. Wong, Adam J. Dobson, Jeanne Kagle, Angela E. Douglas

Abstract

Symbiosis is often characterized by co-evolutionary changes in the genomes of the partners involved. An understanding of these changes can provide insight into the nature of the relationship, including the mechanisms that initiate and maintain an association between organisms. In this study we examined the genome sequences of bacteria isolated from the Drosophila melanogaster gut with the objective of identifying genes that are important for function in the host. We compared microbiota isolates with con-specific or closely related bacterial species isolated from non-fly environments. First the phenotype of germ-free Drosophila (axenic flies) was compared to that of flies colonized with specific bacteria (gnotobiotic flies) as a measure of symbiotic function. Non-fly isolates were functionally distinct from bacteria isolated from flies, conferring slower development and an altered nutrient profile in the host, traits known to be microbiota-dependent. Comparative genomic methods were next employed to identify putative symbiosis factors: genes found in bacteria that restore microbiota-dependent traits to gnotobiotic flies, but absent from those that do not. Factors identified include riboflavin synthesis and stress resistance. We also used a phylogenomic approach to identify protein coding genes for which fly-isolate sequences were more similar to each other than to other sequences, reasoning that these genes may have a shared function unique to the fly environment. This method identified genes in Acetobacter species that cluster in two distinct genomic loci: one predicted to be involved in oxidative stress detoxification and another encoding an efflux pump. In summary, we leveraged genomic and in vivo functional comparisons to identify candidate traits that distinguish symbiotic bacteria. These candidates can serve as the basis for further work investigating the genetic requirements of bacteria for function and persistence in the Drosophila gut.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 6%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 113 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 24%
Researcher 29 23%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 15 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2014.
All research outputs
#5,487,454
of 25,517,918 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5,445
of 29,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,998
of 276,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#48
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,517,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.