↓ Skip to main content

From lifetime to evolution: timescales of human gut microbiota adaptation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From lifetime to evolution: timescales of human gut microbiota adaptation
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00587
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Quercia, Marco Candela, Cristina Giuliani, Silvia Turroni, Donata Luiselli, Simone Rampelli, Patrizia Brigidi, Claudio Franceschi, Maria Giulia Bacalini, Paolo Garagnani, Chiara Pirazzini

Abstract

Human beings harbor gut microbial communities that are essential to preserve human health. Molded by the human genome, the gut microbiota (GM) is an adaptive component of the human superorganisms that allows host adaptation at different timescales, optimizing host physiology from daily life to lifespan scales and human evolutionary history. The GM continuously changes from birth up to the most extreme limits of human life, reconfiguring its metagenomic layout in response to daily variations in diet or specific host physiological and immunological needs at different ages. On the other hand, the microbiota plasticity was strategic to face changes in lifestyle and dietary habits along the course of the recent evolutionary history, that has driven the passage from Paleolithic hunter-gathering societies to Neolithic agricultural farmers to modern Westernized societies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 245 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 22%
Researcher 53 21%
Student > Master 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Other 43 17%
Unknown 37 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,322,090
of 24,585,562 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,771
of 27,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,802
of 267,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#21
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,585,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.