↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of polymyxin resistance: acquired and intrinsic resistance in bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1370 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanisms of polymyxin resistance: acquired and intrinsic resistance in bacteria
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00643
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abiola O. Olaitan, Serge Morand, Jean-Marc Rolain

Abstract

Polymyxins are polycationic antimicrobial peptides that are currently the last-resort antibiotics for the treatment of multidrug-resistant, Gram-negative bacterial infections. The reintroduction of polymyxins for antimicrobial therapy has been followed by an increase in reports of resistance among Gram-negative bacteria. Some bacteria, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii, develop resistance to polymyxins in a process referred to as acquired resistance, whereas other bacteria, such as Proteus spp., Serratia spp., and Burkholderia spp., are naturally resistant to these drugs. Reports of polymyxin resistance in clinical isolates have recently increased, including acquired and intrinsically resistant pathogens. This increase is considered a serious issue, prompting concern due to the low number of currently available effective antibiotics. This review summarizes current knowledge concerning the different strategies bacteria employ to resist the activities of polymyxins. Gram-negative bacteria employ several strategies to protect themselves from polymyxin antibiotics (polymyxin B and colistin), including a variety of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) modifications, such as modifications of lipid A with phosphoethanolamine and 4-amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose, in addition to the use of efflux pumps, the formation of capsules and overexpression of the outer membrane protein OprH, which are all effectively regulated at the molecular level. The increased understanding of these mechanisms is extremely vital and timely to facilitate studies of antimicrobial peptides and find new potential drugs targeting clinically relevant Gram-negative bacteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 1359 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 209 15%
Student > Bachelor 203 15%
Student > Master 183 13%
Researcher 161 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 79 6%
Other 189 14%
Unknown 346 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 261 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 205 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 176 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 106 8%
Chemistry 50 4%
Other 174 13%
Unknown 398 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,092,122
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,450
of 29,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,734
of 371,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#12
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.