↓ Skip to main content

Reconstructing each cell's genome within complex microbial communities—dream or reality?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconstructing each cell's genome within complex microbial communities—dream or reality?
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00771
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott Clingenpeel, Alicia Clum, Patrick Schwientek, Christian Rinke, Tanja Woyke

Abstract

As the vast majority of microorganisms have yet to be cultivated in a laboratory setting, access to their genetic makeup has largely been limited to cultivation-independent methods. These methods, namely metagenomics and more recently single-cell genomics, have become cornerstones for microbial ecology and environmental microbiology. One ultimate goal is the recovery of genome sequences from each cell within an environment to move toward a better understanding of community metabolic potential and to provide substrate for experimental work. As single-cell sequencing has the ability to decipher all sequence information contained in an individual cell, this method holds great promise in tackling such challenge. Methodological limitations and inherent biases however do exist, which will be discussed here based on environmental and benchmark data, to assess how far we are from reaching this goal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Germany 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 98 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 25%
Researcher 26 24%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 24%
Environmental Science 11 10%
Engineering 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 13 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,596,119
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#987
of 28,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,727
of 363,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#11
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.