↓ Skip to main content

The immunoproteasome and viral infection: a complex regulator of inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The immunoproteasome and viral infection: a complex regulator of inflammation
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary K. McCarthy, Jason B. Weinberg

Abstract

During viral infection, proper regulation of immune responses is necessary to ensure successful viral clearance with minimal host tissue damage. Proteasomes play a crucial role in the generation of antigenic peptides for presentation on MHC class I molecules, and thus activation of CD8 T cells, as well as activation of the NF-κB pathway. A specialized type of proteasome called the immunoproteasome is constitutively expressed in hematopoietic cells and induced in non-immune cells during viral infection by interferon signaling. The immunoproteasome regulates CD8 T cell responses to many viral epitopes during infection. Accumulating evidence suggests that the immunoproteasome may also contribute to regulation of proinflammatory cytokine production, activation of the NF-κB pathway, and management of oxidative stress. Many viruses have mechanisms of interfering with immunoproteasome function, including prevention of transcriptional upregulation of immunoproteasome components as well as direct interaction of viral proteins with immunoproteasome subunits. A better understanding of the role of the immunoproteasome in different cell types, tissues, and hosts has the potential to improve vaccine design and facilitate the development of effective treatment strategies for viral infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 255 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 19%
Student > Bachelor 40 16%
Student > Master 39 15%
Researcher 38 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 48 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 74 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 29 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 7%
Chemistry 13 5%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 54 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#19,224,428
of 24,482,039 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19,397
of 27,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,475
of 363,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#188
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,482,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.