↓ Skip to main content

Archaeal membrane-associated proteases: insights on Haloferax volcanii and other haloarchaea

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Archaeal membrane-associated proteases: insights on Haloferax volcanii and other haloarchaea
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00039
Pubmed ID
Authors

María I Giménez, Micaela Cerletti, Rosana E De Castro

Abstract

The function of membrane proteases range from general house-keeping to regulation of cellular processes. Although the biological role of these enzymes in archaea is poorly understood, some of them are implicated in the biogenesis of the archaeal cell envelope and surface structures. The membrane-bound ATP-dependent Lon protease is essential for cell viability and affects membrane carotenoid content in Haloferax volcanii. At least two different proteases are needed in this archaeon to accomplish the posttranslational modifications of the S-layer glycoprotein. The rhomboid protease RhoII is involved in the N-glycosylation of the S-layer protein with a sulfoquinovose-containing oligosaccharide while archaeosortase ArtA mediates the proteolytic processing coupled-lipid modification of this glycoprotein facilitating its attachment to the archaeal cell surface. Interestingly, two different signal peptidase I homologs exist in H. volcanii, Sec11a and Sec11b, which likely play distinct physiological roles. Type IV prepilin peptidase PibD processes flagellin/pilin precursors, being essential for the biogenesis and function of the archaellum and other cell surface structures in H. volcanii.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 11%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,644,824
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#8,382
of 25,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,074
of 354,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#98
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.