You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative genomics of Roseobacter clade bacteria isolated from the accessory nidamental gland of Euprymna scolopes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00123 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew J. Collins, Matthew S. Fullmer, Johann P. Gogarten, Spencer V. Nyholm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Chile | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 32% |
| Researcher | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2015.
All research outputs
#2,416,110
of 25,388,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,847
of 29,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,389
of 269,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#27
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.