↓ Skip to main content

Contribution of Acinetobacter-derived cephalosporinase-30 to sulbactam resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contribution of Acinetobacter-derived cephalosporinase-30 to sulbactam resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00231
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shu-Chen Kuo, Yi-Tzu Lee, Tsai-Ling Yang Lauderdale, Wei-Cheng Huang, Ming-Fen Chuang, Chien-Pei Chen, Shey-Chiang Su, Kuan-Rong Lee, Te-Li Chen

Abstract

The sulbactam resistance rate in Acinetobacter baumannii has increased worldwide. Previous reports have shown that the β-lactamase bla TEM-1 confers resistance to sulbactam in A. baumannii. The purpose of this study was to examine whether other β-lactamases, including the Acinetobacter-derived cephalosporinase (ADC), OXA-23, OXA-24/72, and OXA-58 families, also contribute to sulbactam resistance in A. baumannii. The correlation between these β-lactamases and the sulbactam minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined using A. baumannii clinical isolates from diverse clonality, which were collected in a nationwide surveillance program from 2002 to 2010 in Taiwan. A possible association between the genetic structure of ISAba1-bla ADC-30 and sulbactam resistance was observed because this genetic structure was detected in 97% of sulbactam-resistant strains compared with 10% of sulbactam-susceptible strains. Transformation of ISAba1-bla ADC-30 into susceptible strains increased the sulbactam MIC from 2 to 32 μg/ml, which required bla ADC-30 overexpression using an upstream promoter in ISAba1. Flow cytometry showed that ADC-30 production increased in response to sulbactam, ticarcillin, and ceftazidime treatment. This effect was regulated at the RNA level but not by an increase in the bla ADC-30 gene copy number as indicated by quantitative PCR. Purified ADC-30 decreased the inhibitory zone created by sulbactam or ceftazidime, similarly to TEM-1. In conclusion, ADC-30 overexpression conferred resistance to sulbactam in diverse clinical A. baumannii isolates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 20 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2015.
All research outputs
#17,751,741
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#17,145
of 24,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,065
of 263,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#231
of 331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.