You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bioemulsifiers are not biosurfactants and require different screening approaches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00245 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chibuzo Uzoigwe, J. Grant Burgess, Christopher J. Ennis, Pattanathu K. S. M. Rahman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 417 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 74 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 14% |
| Researcher | 44 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 57 | 13% |
| Unknown | 96 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 91 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 67 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 33 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 31 | 7% |
| Engineering | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 13% |
| Unknown | 122 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,752,946
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#17,146
of 24,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,969
of 264,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#241
of 348 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 348 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.