↓ Skip to main content

The geomicrobiology of CO2 geosequestration: a focused review on prokaryotic community responses to field-scale CO2 injection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The geomicrobiology of CO2 geosequestration: a focused review on prokaryotic community responses to field-scale CO2 injection
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andre Mu, John W. Moreau

Abstract

Our primary research paper (Mu et al., 2014) demonstrated selective changes to a deep subsurface prokaryotic community as a result of CO2 stress. Analyzing geochemical and microbial 16S rRNA gene profiles, we evaluated how in situ prokaryotic communities responded to increased CO2 and the presence of trace organic compounds, and related temporal shifts in phylogeny to changes in metabolic potential. In this focused review, we extend upon our previous discussion to present analysis of taxonomic unit co-occurrence profiles from the same field experiment, to attempt to describe dynamic community behavior within the deep subsurface. Understanding the physiology of the subsurface microbial biosphere, including how key functional groups integrate into the community, will be critical to determining the fate of injected CO2. For example, community-wide network analyses may provide insights to whether microbes cooperatively produce biofilm biomass, and/or biomineralize the CO2, and hence, induce changes to formation porosity or changes in electron flow. Furthermore, we discuss potential impacts to the feasibility of subsurface CO2 storage of selectively enriching for particular metabolic functions (e.g., methanogenesis) as a result of CO2 injection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 5%
United States 3 5%
Brazil 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 52 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 30%
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 23%
Environmental Science 11 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Engineering 5 8%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2015.
All research outputs
#13,371,402
of 23,573,357 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9,651
of 26,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,902
of 266,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#133
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,573,357 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.