↓ Skip to main content

Forest floor community metatranscriptomes identify fungal and bacterial responses to N deposition in two maple forests

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Forest floor community metatranscriptomes identify fungal and bacterial responses to N deposition in two maple forests
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cedar N Hesse, Rebecca C Mueller, Momchilo Vuyisich, La Verne Gallegos-Graves, Cheryl D Gleasner, Donald R Zak, Cheryl R Kuske

Abstract

Anthropogenic N deposition alters patterns of C and N cycling in temperate forests, where forest floor litter decomposition is a key process mediated by a diverse community of bacteria and fungi. To track forest floor decomposer activity we generated metatranscriptomes that simultaneously surveyed the actively expressed bacterial and eukaryote genes in the forest floor, to compare the impact of N deposition on the decomposers in two natural maple forests in Michigan, USA, where replicate field plots had been amended with N for 16 years. Site and N amendment responses were compared using about 74,000 carbohydrate active enzyme transcript sequences (CAZymes) in each metatranscriptome. Parallel ribosomal RNA (rRNA) surveys of bacterial and fungal biomass and taxonomic composition showed no significant differences in either biomass or OTU richness between the two sites or in response to N. Site and N amendment were not significant variables defining bacterial taxonomic composition, but they were significant for fungal community composition, explaining 17 and 14% of the variability, respectively. The relative abundance of expressed bacterial and fungal CAZymes changed significantly with N amendment in one of the forests, and N-response trends were also identified in the second forest. Although the two ambient forests were similar in community biomass, taxonomic structure and active CAZyme profile, the shifts in active CAZyme profiles in response to N-amendment differed between the sites. One site responded with an over-expression of bacterial CAZymes, and the other site responded with an over-expression of both fungal and different bacterial CAZymes. Both sites showed reduced representation of fungal lignocellulose degrading enzymes in N-amendment plots. The metatranscriptome approach provided a holistic assessment of eukaryote and bacterial gene expression and is applicable to other systems where eukaryotes and bacteria interact.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 142 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 27%
Researcher 32 21%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 40%
Environmental Science 36 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 29 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2015.
All research outputs
#6,069,452
of 24,546,092 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#5,527
of 27,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,769
of 270,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#76
of 356 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,546,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 356 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.