↓ Skip to main content

Toward a new focus in antibiotic and drug discovery from the Streptomyces arsenal

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toward a new focus in antibiotic and drug discovery from the Streptomyces arsenal
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00461
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergio Antoraz, Ramón I. Santamaría, Margarita Díaz, David Sanz, Héctor Rodríguez

Abstract

Emergence of antibiotic resistant pathogens is changing the way scientists look for new antibiotic compounds. This race against the increased prevalence of multi-resistant strains makes it necessary to expedite the search for new compounds with antibiotic activity and to increase the production of the known. Here, we review a variety of new scientific approaches aiming to enhance antibiotic production in Streptomyces. These include: (i) elucidation of the signals that trigger the antibiotic biosynthetic pathways to improve culture media, (ii) bacterial hormone studies aiming to reproduce intra and interspecific communications resulting in antibiotic burst, (iii) co-cultures to mimic competition-collaboration scenarios in nature, and (iv) the very recent in situ search for antibiotics that might be applied in Streptomyces natural habitats. These new research strategies combined with new analytical and molecular techniques should accelerate the discovery process when the urgency for new compounds is higher than ever.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 178 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 19%
Researcher 31 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 18%
Chemistry 17 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 40 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,409,030
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#19,278
of 24,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,081
of 264,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#276
of 381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.