↓ Skip to main content

Microbial interspecies interactions: recent findings in syntrophic consortia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
434 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbial interspecies interactions: recent findings in syntrophic consortia
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00477
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atsushi Kouzuma, Souichiro Kato, Kazuya Watanabe

Abstract

Microbes are ubiquitous in our biosphere, and inevitably live in communities. They excrete a variety of metabolites and support the growth of other microbes in a community. According to the law of chemical equilibrium, the consumption of excreted metabolites by recipient microbes can accelerate the metabolism of donor microbes. This is the concept of syntrophy, which is a type of mutualism and governs the metabolism and growth of diverse microbes in natural and engineered ecosystems. A representative example of syntrophy is found in methanogenic communities, where reducing equivalents, e.g., hydrogen and formate, transfer between syntrophic partners. Studies have revealed that microbes involved in syntrophy have evolved molecular mechanisms to establish specific partnerships and interspecies communication, resulting in efficient metabolic cooperation. In addition, recent studies have provided evidence suggesting that microbial interspecies transfer of reducing equivalents also occurs as electric current via biotic (e.g., pili) and abiotic (e.g., conductive mineral and carbon particles) electric conduits. In this review, we describe these findings as examples of sophisticated cooperative behavior between different microbial species. We suggest that these interactions have fundamental roles in shaping the structure and activity of microbial communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 434 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 425 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 25%
Researcher 62 14%
Student > Master 56 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 63 15%
Unknown 92 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 24%
Environmental Science 74 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 11%
Engineering 27 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 3%
Other 49 11%
Unknown 117 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,069,153
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,625
of 28,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,243
of 269,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#27
of 379 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 379 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.