↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of the stoichiometry and efficiency of CO2 fixation coupled to reduced sulfur oxidation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of the stoichiometry and efficiency of CO2 fixation coupled to reduced sulfur oxidation
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00484
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith M. Klatt, Lubos Polerecky

Abstract

Chemolithoautotrophic sulfur oxidizing bacteria (SOB) couple the oxidation of reduced sulfur compounds to the production of biomass. Their role in the cycling of carbon, sulfur, oxygen, and nitrogen is, however, difficult to quantify due to the complexity of sulfur oxidation pathways. We describe a generic theoretical framework for linking the stoichiometry and energy conservation efficiency of autotrophic sulfur oxidation while accounting for the partitioning of the reduced sulfur pool between the energy generating and energy conserving steps as well as between the main possible products (sulfate vs. zero-valent sulfur). Using this framework, we show that the energy conservation efficiency varies widely among SOB with no apparent relationship to their phylogeny. Aerobic SOB equipped with reverse dissimilatory sulfite reductase tend to have higher efficiency than those relying on the complete Sox pathway, whereas for anaerobic SOB the presence of membrane-bound, as opposed to periplasmic, nitrate reductase systems appears to be linked to higher efficiency. We employ the framework to also show how limited rate measurements can be used to estimate the primary productivity of SOB without the knowledge of the sulfate-to-zero-valent-sulfur production ratio. Finally, we discuss how the framework can help researchers gain new insights into the activity of SOB and their niches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Germany 3 3%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 100 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 29%
Student > Master 17 16%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 19 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Engineering 6 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 25 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,516,830
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4,527
of 24,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,850
of 266,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#59
of 395 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 395 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.