↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial exopolysaccharides: biosynthesis pathways and engineering strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
420 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
837 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bacterial exopolysaccharides: biosynthesis pathways and engineering strategies
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00496
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jochen Schmid, Volker Sieber, Bernd Rehm

Abstract

Bacteria produce a wide range of exopolysaccharides which are synthesized via different biosynthesis pathways. The genes responsible for synthesis are often clustered within the genome of the respective production organism. A better understanding of the fundamental processes involved in exopolysaccharide biosynthesis and the regulation of these processes is critical toward genetic, metabolic and protein-engineering approaches to produce tailor-made polymers. These designer polymers will exhibit superior material properties targeting medical and industrial applications. Exploiting the natural design space for production of a variety of biopolymer will open up a range of new applications. Here, we summarize the key aspects of microbial exopolysaccharide biosynthesis and highlight the latest engineering approaches toward the production of tailor-made variants with the potential to be used as valuable renewable and high-performance products for medical and industrial applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 837 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 821 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 153 18%
Student > Bachelor 105 13%
Researcher 101 12%
Student > Master 97 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 5%
Other 105 13%
Unknown 232 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 184 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 176 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 56 7%
Environmental Science 36 4%
Engineering 35 4%
Other 88 11%
Unknown 262 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,280,315
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#22,367
of 24,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,997
of 266,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#317
of 387 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 387 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.