↓ Skip to main content

When nanoparticles meet biofilms—interactions guiding the environmental fate and accumulation of nanoparticles

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
210 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When nanoparticles meet biofilms—interactions guiding the environmental fate and accumulation of nanoparticles
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00591
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaoru Ikuma, Alan W. Decho, Boris L. T. Lau

Abstract

Bacteria are essential components of all natural and many engineered systems. The most active fractions of bacteria are now recognized to occur as biofilms, where cells are attached and surrounded by a secreted matrix of "sticky" extracellular polymeric substances. Recent investigations have established that significant accumulation of nanoparticles (NPs) occurs in aquatic biofilms. These studies point to the emerging roles of biofilms for influencing partitioning and possibly transformations of NPs in both natural and engineered systems. While attached biofilms are efficient "sponges" for NPs, efforts to elucidate the fundamental mechanisms guiding interactions between NPs and biofilms have just begun. In this mini review, special attention is focused on NP-biofilm interactions within the aquatic environment. We highlight key physical, chemical, and biological processes that affect interactions and accumulation of NPs by bacterial biofilms. We posit that these biofilm processes present the likely possibility for unique biological and chemical transformations of NPs. Ultimately, the environmental fate of NPs is influenced by biofilms, and therefore requires a more in-depth understanding of their fundamental properties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 289 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 22%
Student > Master 45 15%
Researcher 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 69 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 10%
Environmental Science 30 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 9%
Chemistry 24 8%
Other 69 24%
Unknown 83 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#12,925,574
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9,229
of 24,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,977
of 239,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#135
of 379 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 379 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.