↓ Skip to main content

Host-pathogen interactions between the human innate immune system and Candida albicans—understanding and modeling defense and evasion strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Host-pathogen interactions between the human innate immune system and Candida albicans—understanding and modeling defense and evasion strategies
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00625
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sybille Dühring, Sebastian Germerodt, Christine Skerka, Peter F. Zipfel, Thomas Dandekar, Stefan Schuster

Abstract

The diploid, polymorphic yeast Candida albicans is one of the most important human pathogenic fungi. C. albicans can grow, proliferate and coexist as a commensal on or within the human host for a long time. However, alterations in the host environment can render C. albicans virulent. In this review, we describe the immunological cross-talk between C. albicans and the human innate immune system. We give an overview in form of pairs of human defense strategies including immunological mechanisms as well as general stressors such as nutrient limitation, pH, fever etc. and the corresponding fungal response and evasion mechanisms. Furthermore, Computational Systems Biology approaches to model and investigate these complex interactions are highlighted with a special focus on game-theoretical methods and agent-based models. An outlook on interesting questions to be tackled by Systems Biology regarding entangled defense and evasion mechanisms is given.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 159 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 26%
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Researcher 14 9%
Other 7 4%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 34 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 38 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,817,410
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#13,786
of 24,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,599
of 262,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#194
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.