↓ Skip to main content

Transcription factor-based biosensors enlightened by the analyte

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcription factor-based biosensors enlightened by the analyte
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00648
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raul Fernandez-López, Raul Ruiz, Fernando de la Cruz, Gabriel Moncalián

Abstract

Whole cell biosensors (WCBs) have multiple applications for environmental monitoring, detecting a wide range of pollutants. WCBs depend critically on the sensitivity and specificity of the transcription factor (TF) used to detect the analyte. We describe the mechanism of regulation and the structural and biochemical properties of TF families that are used, or could be used, for the development of environmental WCBs. Focusing on the chemical nature of the analyte, we review TFs that respond to aromatic compounds (XylS-AraC, XylR-NtrC, and LysR), metal ions (MerR, ArsR, DtxR, Fur, and NikR) or antibiotics (TetR and MarR). Analyzing the structural domains involved in DNA recognition, we highlight the similitudes in the DNA binding domains (DBDs) of these TF families. Opposite to DBDs, the wide range of analytes detected by TFs results in a diversity of structures at the effector binding domain. The modular architecture of TFs opens the possibility of engineering TFs with hybrid DNA and effector specificities. Yet, the lack of a crisp correlation between structural domains and specific functions makes this a challenging task.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 198 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 25%
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 5%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 33 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 75 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 25%
Engineering 11 5%
Chemistry 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 39 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2015.
All research outputs
#15,339,713
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#15,147
of 24,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,958
of 263,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#229
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.