You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic Pseudomonas isolates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00745 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas Oteino, Richard D. Lally, Samuel Kiwanuka, Andrew Lloyd, David Ryan, Kieran J. Germaine, David N. Dowling |
| Abstract |
The use of plant growth promoting bacterial inoculants as live microbial biofertilizers provides a promising alternative to chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Inorganic phosphate solubilization is one of the major mechanisms of plant growth promotion by plant associated bacteria. This involves bacteria releasing organic acids into the soil which solubilize the phosphate complexes converting them into ortho-phosphate which is available for plant up-take and utilization. The study presented here describes the ability of endophytic bacteria to produce gluconic acid (GA), solubilize insoluble phosphate, and stimulate the growth of Pisum sativum L. plants. This study also describes the genetic systems within three of these endophyte strains thought to be responsible for their effective phosphate solubilizing abilities. The results showed that many of the endophytic strains produced GA (14-169 mM) and have moderate to high phosphate solubilization capacities (~400-1300 mg L(-1)). When inoculated into P. sativum L. plants grown in soil under soluble phosphate limiting conditions, the endophytes that produced medium-high levels of GA displayed beneficial plant growth promotion effects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 683 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 676 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 111 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 97 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 87 | 13% |
| Researcher | 67 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 53 | 8% |
| Other | 86 | 13% |
| Unknown | 182 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 276 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 92 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 34 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 33 | 5% |
| Engineering | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 5% |
| Unknown | 202 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,287,620
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#6,212
of 24,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,040
of 263,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#79
of 350 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 350 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.