↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of the gut microbiota of Kawasaki disease patients by metagenomic analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of the gut microbiota of Kawasaki disease patients by metagenomic analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00824
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akiko Kinumaki, Tsuyoshi Sekizuka, Hiromichi Hamada, Kengo Kato, Akifumi Yamashita, Makoto Kuroda

Abstract

Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute febrile illness of early childhood. Previous reports have suggested that genetic disease susceptibility factors, together with a triggering infectious agent, could be involved in KD pathogenesis; however, the precise etiology of this disease remains unknown. Additionally, previous culture-based studies have suggested a possible role of intestinal microbiota in KD pathogenesis. In this study, we performed metagenomic analysis to comprehensively assess the longitudinal variation in the intestinal microbiota of 28 KD patients. Several notable bacterial genera were commonly extracted during the acute phase, whereas a relative increase in the number of Ruminococcus bacteria was observed during the non-acute phase of KD. The metagenomic analysis results based on bacterial species classification suggested that the number of sequencing reads with similarity to five Streptococcus spp. (S. pneumonia, pseudopneumoniae, oralis, gordonii, and sanguinis), in addition to patient-derived Streptococcus isolates, markedly increased during the acute phase in most patients. Streptococci include a variety of pathogenic bacteria and probiotic bacteria that promote human health; therefore, this further species discrimination could comprehensively illuminate the KD-associated microbiota. The findings of this study suggest that KD-related Streptococci might be involved in the pathogenesis of this disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,867,442
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#6,616
of 28,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,729
of 270,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#88
of 371 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 371 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.