↓ Skip to main content

Microbiomes: unifying animal and plant systems through the lens of community ecology theory

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
64 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
407 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbiomes: unifying animal and plant systems through the lens of community ecology theory
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00869
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie Christian, Briana K. Whitaker, Keith Clay

Abstract

The field of microbiome research is arguably one of the fastest growing in biology. Bacteria feature prominently in studies on animal health, but fungi appear to be the more prominent functional symbionts for plants. Despite the similarities in the ecological organization and evolutionary importance of animal-bacterial and plant-fungal microbiomes, there is a general failure across disciplines to integrate the advances made in each system. Researchers studying bacterial symbionts in animals benefit from greater access to efficient sequencing pipelines and taxonomic reference databases, perhaps due to high medical and veterinary interest. However, researchers studying plant-fungal symbionts benefit from the relative tractability of fungi under laboratory conditions and ease of cultivation. Thus each system has strengths to offer, but both suffer from the lack of a common conceptual framework. We argue that community ecology best illuminates complex species interactions across space and time. In this synthesis we compare and contrast the animal-bacterial and plant-fungal microbiomes using six core theories in community ecology (i.e., succession, community assembly, metacommunities, multi-trophic interactions, disturbance, restoration). The examples and questions raised are meant to spark discussion amongst biologists and lead to the integration of these two systems, as well as more informative, manipulatory experiments on microbiomes research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 390 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 104 26%
Researcher 79 19%
Student > Master 48 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Other 58 14%
Unknown 52 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 197 48%
Environmental Science 47 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 2%
Other 29 7%
Unknown 71 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,207,126
of 25,452,734 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#692
of 29,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,314
of 279,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#10
of 407 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,452,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 407 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.