↓ Skip to main content

Quorum-sensing regulation in staphylococci—an overview

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
352 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
668 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quorum-sensing regulation in staphylococci—an overview
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01174
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine Y. Le, Michael Otto

Abstract

Staphylococci are frequent human commensals and some species can cause disease. Staphylococcus aureus in particular is a dangerous human pathogen. In staphylococci, the ability to sense the bacterial cell density, or quorum, and to respond with genetic adaptations is due to one main system, which is called accessory gene regulator (Agr). The extracellular signal of Agr is a post-translationally modified peptide containing a thiolactone structure. Under conditions of high cell density, Agr is responsible for the increased expression of many toxins and degradative exoenzymes, and decreased expression of several colonization factors. This regulation is important for the timing of virulence factor expression during infection and the development of acute disease, while low activity of Agr is associated with chronic staphylococcal infections, such as those involving biofilm formation. Accordingly, drugs inhibiting Agr are being evaluated for their capacity to control acute forms of S. aureus infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 668 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 665 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 114 17%
Student > Bachelor 112 17%
Student > Master 89 13%
Researcher 61 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 5%
Other 62 9%
Unknown 194 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 139 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 92 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 6%
Chemistry 20 3%
Other 56 8%
Unknown 209 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2016.
All research outputs
#13,502,908
of 24,129,125 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9,307
of 27,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,629
of 289,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#137
of 424 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,129,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 424 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.