↓ Skip to main content

Comparative metagenomics reveals impact of contaminants on groundwater microbiomes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative metagenomics reveals impact of contaminants on groundwater microbiomes
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher L. Hemme, Qichao Tu, Zhou Shi, Yujia Qin, Weimin Gao, Ye Deng, Joy D. Van Nostrand, Liyou Wu, Zhili He, Patrick S. G. Chain, Susannah G. Tringe, Matthew W. Fields, Edward M. Rubin, James M. Tiedje, Terry C. Hazen, Adam P. Arkin, Jizhong Zhou

Abstract

To understand patterns of geochemical cycling in pristine versus contaminated groundwater ecosystems, pristine shallow groundwater (FW301) and contaminated groundwater (FW106) samples from the Oak Ridge Integrated Field Research Center (OR-IFRC) were sequenced and compared to each other to determine phylogenetic and metabolic difference between the communities. Proteobacteria (e.g., Burkholderia, Pseudomonas) are the most abundant lineages in the pristine community, though a significant proportion ( >55%) of the community is composed of poorly characterized low abundance (individually <1%) lineages. The phylogenetic diversity of the pristine community contributed to a broader diversity of metabolic networks than the contaminated community. In addition, the pristine community encodes redundant and mostly complete geochemical cycles distributed over multiple lineages and appears capable of a wide range of metabolic activities. In contrast, many geochemical cycles in the contaminated community appear truncated or minimized due to decreased biodiversity and dominance by Rhodanobacter populations capable of surviving the combination of stresses at the site. These results indicate that the pristine site contains more robust and encodes more functional redundancy than the stressed community, which contributes to more efficient nutrient cycling and adaptability than the stressed community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 143 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 30%
Researcher 31 20%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 4%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 14%
Environmental Science 18 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 28 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,247,312
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,914
of 28,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,308
of 290,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#38
of 424 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 424 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.