↓ Skip to main content

Heroin inhibits HIV-restriction miRNAs and enhances HIV infection of macrophages

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heroin inhibits HIV-restriction miRNAs and enhances HIV infection of macrophages
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01230
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xu Wang, Tong-Cui Ma, Jie-Liang Li, Yu Zhou, Ellen B. Geller, Martin W. Adler, Jin-Song Peng, Wang Zhou, Dun-Jin Zhou, Wen-Zhe Ho

Abstract

Although opioids have been extensively studied for their impact on the immune system, limited information is available about the specific actions of opioids on intracellular antiviral innate immunity against HIV infection. Thus, we investigated whether heroin, one of the most abused drugs, inhibits the expression of intracellular HIV restriction microRNA (miRNA) and facilitates HIV replication in macrophages. Heroin treatment of macrophages enhanced HIV replication, which was associated with the downregulation of several HIV restriction miRNAs. These heroin-mediated actions on the miRNAs and HIV could be antagonized by naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist. Furthermore, the in vitro negative impact of heroin on HIV-associated miRNAs was confirmed by the in vivo observation that heroin addicts had significantly lower levels of macrophage-derived HIV restriction miRNAs than those in the control subjects. These in vitro and in vivo findings indicate that heroin use compromises intracellular anti-HIV innate immunity, providing a favorable microenvironment for HIV survival in the target cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2016.
All research outputs
#13,958,483
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#11,421
of 24,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,719
of 285,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#185
of 435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.