↓ Skip to main content

Hunting Down Frame Shifts: Ecological Analysis of Diverse Functional Gene Sequences

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hunting Down Frame Shifts: Ecological Analysis of Diverse Functional Gene Sequences
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01267
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michal Strejcek, Qiong Wang, Jakub Ridl, Ondrej Uhlik

Abstract

Functional gene ecological analyses using amplicon sequencing can be challenging as translated sequences are often burdened with shifted reading frames. The aim of this work was to evaluate several bioinformatics tools designed to correct errors which arise during sequencing in an effort to reduce the number of frameshifts (FS). Genes encoding for alpha subunits of biphenyl (bphA) and benzoate (benA) dioxygenases were used as model sequences. FrameBot, a FS correction tool, was able to reduce the number of detected FS to zero. However, up to 44% of sequences were discarded by FrameBot as non-specific targets. Therefore, we proposed a de novo mode of FrameBot for FS correction, which works on a similar basis as common chimera identifying platforms and is not dependent on reference sequences. By nature of FrameBot de novo design, it is crucial to provide it with data as error free as possible. We tested the ability of several publicly available correction tools to decrease the number of errors in the data sets. The combination of maximum expected error filtering and single linkage pre-clustering proved to be the most efficient read processing approach. Applying FrameBot de novo on the processed data enabled analysis of BphA sequences with minimal losses of potentially functional sequences not homologous to those previously known. This experiment also demonstrated the extensive diversity of dioxygenases in soil. A script which performs FrameBot de novo is presented in the supplementary material to the study or available at https://github.com/strejcem/FBdenovo. The tool was also implemented into FunGene Pipeline available at http://fungene.cme.msu.edu/FunGenePipeline/.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 11%
Unknown 24 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 22%
Environmental Science 5 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Computer Science 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,940,593
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#23,634
of 26,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,322
of 390,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#348
of 422 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 422 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.