↓ Skip to main content

The Prevalence and Control of Bacillus and Related Spore-Forming Bacteria in the Dairy Industry

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
222 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
428 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Prevalence and Control of Bacillus and Related Spore-Forming Bacteria in the Dairy Industry
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2015
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01418
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nidhi Gopal, Colin Hill, Paul R. Ross, Tom P. Beresford, Mark A. Fenelon, Paul D. Cotter

Abstract

Milk produced in udder cells is sterile but due to its high nutrient content, it can be a good growth substrate for contaminating bacteria. The quality of milk is monitored via somatic cell counts and total bacterial counts, with prescribed regulatory limits to ensure quality and safety. Bacterial contaminants can cause disease, or spoilage of milk and its secondary products. Aerobic spore-forming bacteria, such as those from the genera Sporosarcina, Paenisporosarcina, Brevibacillus, Paenibacillus, Geobacillus and Bacillus, are a particular concern in this regard as they are able to survive industrial pasteurization and form biofilms within pipes and stainless steel equipment. These single or multiple-species biofilms become a reservoir of spoilage microorganisms and a cycle of contamination can be initiated. Indeed, previous studies have highlighted that these microorganisms are highly prevalent in dead ends, corners, cracks, crevices, gaskets, valves and the joints of stainless steel equipment used in the dairy manufacturing plants. Hence, adequate monitoring and control measures are essential to prevent spoilage and ensure consumer safety. Common controlling approaches include specific cleaning-in-place processes, chemical and biological biocides and other novel methods. In this review, we highlight the problems caused by these microorganisms, and discuss issues relating to their prevalence, monitoring thereof and control with respect to the dairy industry.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 428 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 81 19%
Student > Bachelor 56 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 10%
Researcher 43 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 4%
Other 57 13%
Unknown 128 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 133 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 5%
Chemistry 13 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 3%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 156 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2023.
All research outputs
#13,545,505
of 23,847,962 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9,803
of 26,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,101
of 394,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#159
of 404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,847,962 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.