↓ Skip to main content

Silver As Antibacterial toward Listeria monocytogenes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Silver As Antibacterial toward Listeria monocytogenes
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00307
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Belluco, Carmen Losasso, Ilaria Patuzzi, Laura Rigo, Daniele Conficoni, Federica Gallocchio, Veronica Cibin, Paolo Catellani, Severino Segato, Antonia Ricci

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes is a serious foodborne pathogen that can contaminate food during processing and can grow during food shelf-life. New types of safe and effective food contact materials embedding antimicrobial agents, like silver, can play an important role in the food industry. The present work aimed at evaluating the in vitro growth kinetics of different strains of L. monocytogenes in the presence of silver, both in its ionic and nano form. The antimicrobial effect was determined by assaying the number of culturable bacterial cells, which formed colonies after incubation in the presence of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) or silver nitrate (AgNO3). Ionic release experiments were performed in parallel. A different reduction of bacterial viability between silver ionic and nano forms was observed, with a time delayed effect exerted by AgNPs. An association between antimicrobial activity and ions concentration was shown by both silver chemical forms, suggesting the major role of ions in the antimicrobial mode of action.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Other 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Materials Science 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,840,844
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#13,837
of 24,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,843
of 298,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#324
of 544 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 544 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.