↓ Skip to main content

Improving Control of Tuberculosis in Low-Burden Countries: Insights from Mathematical Modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving Control of Tuberculosis in Low-Burden Countries: Insights from Mathematical Modeling
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00394
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter J. White, Ibrahim Abubakar

Abstract

Tuberculosis control and elimination remains a challenge for public health even in low-burden countries. New technology and novel approaches to case-finding, diagnosis, and treatment are causes for optimism but they need to be used cost-effectively. This in turn requires improved understanding of the epidemiology of TB and analysis of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different interventions. We describe the contribution that mathematical modeling can make to understanding epidemiology and control of TB in different groups, guiding improved approaches to public health interventions. We emphasize that modeling is not a substitute for collecting data but rather is complementary to empirical research, helping determine what are the key questions to address to maximize the public-health impact of research, helping to plan studies, and making maximal use of available data, particularly from surveillance, and observational studies. We provide examples of how modeling and related empirical research inform policy and discuss how a combination of these approaches can be used to address current questions of key importance, including use of whole-genome sequencing, screening and treatment for latent infection, and combating drug resistance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 92 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Mathematics 6 6%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 34 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2016.
All research outputs
#13,559,314
of 23,978,283 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#9,696
of 26,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,042
of 301,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#263
of 582 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,978,283 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 582 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.