↓ Skip to main content

Proteogenomic Analysis of Mycobacterium smegmatis Using High Resolution Mass Spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Proteogenomic Analysis of Mycobacterium smegmatis Using High Resolution Mass Spectrometry
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00427
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthys G. Potgieter, Kehilwe C. Nakedi, Jon M. Ambler, Andrew J. M. Nel, Shaun Garnett, Nelson C. Soares, Nicola Mulder, Jonathan M. Blackburn

Abstract

Biochemical evidence is vital for accurate genome annotation. The integration of experimental data collected at the proteome level using high resolution mass spectrometry allows for improvements in genome annotation by providing evidence for novel gene models, while validating or modifying others. Here, we report the results of a proteogenomic analysis of a reference strain of Mycobacterium smegmatis (mc(2)155), a fast growing model organism for the pathogenic Mycobacterium tuberculosis-the causative agent for Tuberculosis. By integrating high throughput LC/MS/MS proteomic data with genomic six frame translation and ab initio gene prediction databases, a total of 2887 ORFs were identified, including 2810 ORFs annotated to a Reference protein, and 63 ORFs not previously annotated to a Reference protein. Further, the translational start site (TSS) was validated for 558 Reference proteome gene models, while upstream translational evidence was identified for 81. In addition, N-terminus derived peptide identifications allowed for downstream TSS modification of a further 24 gene models. We validated the existence of six previously described interrupted coding sequences at the peptide level, and provide evidence for four novel frameshift positions. Analysis of peptide posterior error probability (PEP) scores indicates high-confidence novel peptide identifications and shows that the genome of M. smegmatis mc(2)155 is not yet fully annotated. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD003500.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Engineering 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,315,795
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#15,143
of 24,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,846
of 300,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#338
of 544 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 544 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.