↓ Skip to main content

Interactions of Aspergillus fumigatus Conidia with Airway Epithelial Cells: A Critical Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interactions of Aspergillus fumigatus Conidia with Airway Epithelial Cells: A Critical Review
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00472
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carys A. Croft, Luka Culibrk, Margo M. Moore, Scott J. Tebbutt

Abstract

Aspergillus fumigatus is an environmental filamentous fungus that also acts as an opportunistic pathogen able to cause a variety of symptoms, from an allergic response to a life-threatening disseminated fungal infection. The infectious agents are inhaled conidia whose first point of contact is most likely to be an airway epithelial cell (AEC). The interaction between epithelial cells and conidia is multifaceted and complex, and has implications for later steps in pathogenesis. Increasing evidence has demonstrated a key role for the airway epithelium in the response to respiratory pathogens, particularly at early stages of infection; therefore, elucidating the early stages of interaction of conidia with AECs is essential to understand the establishment of infection in cohorts of at-risk patients. Here, we present a comprehensive review of the early interactions between A. fumigatus and AECs, including bronchial and alveolar epithelial cells. We describe mechanisms of adhesion, internalization of conidia by AECs, the immune response of AECs, as well as the role of fungal virulence factors, and patterns of fungal gene expression characteristic of early infection. A clear understanding of the mechanisms involved in the early establishment of infection by A. fumigatus could point to novel targets for therapy and prophylaxis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 165 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 25%
Student > Master 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 37 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 34 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 10%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 40 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2016.
All research outputs
#20,318,358
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#22,467
of 24,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,140
of 301,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#466
of 544 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 544 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.