↓ Skip to main content

Yeast Interactions in Inoculated Wine Fermentation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Yeast Interactions in Inoculated Wine Fermentation
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00555
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maurizio Ciani, Angela Capece, Francesca Comitini, Laura Canonico, Gabriella Siesto, Patrizia Romano

Abstract

The use of selected starter culture is widely diffused in winemaking. In pure fermentation, the ability of inoculated Saccharomyces cerevisiae to suppress the wild microflora is one of the most important feature determining the starter ability to dominate the process. Since the wine is the result of the interaction of several yeast species and strains, many studies are available on the effect of mixed cultures on the final wine quality. In mixed fermentation the interactions between the different yeasts composing the starter culture can led the stability of the final product and the analytical and aromatic profile. In the present review, we will discuss the recent developments regarding yeast interactions in pure and in mixed fermentation, focusing on the influence of interactions on growth and dominance in the process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 327 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 56 17%
Student > Master 42 13%
Researcher 40 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 90 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 5%
Engineering 12 4%
Chemistry 10 3%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 105 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2021.
All research outputs
#14,258,962
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#12,446
of 24,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,987
of 298,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#306
of 553 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 553 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.